{"id":33121,"date":"2017-05-15T13:26:47","date_gmt":"2017-05-15T11:26:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.hiig.de\/?p=33121\/"},"modified":"2023-06-02T12:30:59","modified_gmt":"2023-06-02T10:30:59","slug":"imagining-the-digital-society-metaphors-from-the-past-and-present","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hiig.de\/en\/imagining-the-digital-society-metaphors-from-the-past-and-present\/","title":{"rendered":"Imagining the Digital Society \u2013 Metaphors from the Past and Present"},"content":{"rendered":"

The current rapid social and technological change is giving rise to enormous uncertainties \u2013 and a great need for explanations and sense-making. How do we understand the digital society? When we talk about the future that we cannot know and the present that we do not understand, we cannot but use the conceptual apparatus of the past \u2013 with normative, social and economic implications. This article is introducing a series of articles on the politics of metaphors in the Digital Society. It aims to uncover the hidden assumptions and concepts within our discourses of the digital, piece by piece. The series is edited by HIIG researcher Christian Katzenbach and Stefan Larsson from Lund University Internet Institute.<\/i><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

Dossier: How metaphors shape the digital society<\/a><\/p>\n

Digital Transformations \u2013 and the Need for Sense-Making<\/h3>\n

We are living in a time of transformation. The digitalisation of nearly every aspect of contemporary society is bringing about profound changes in politics, economics, culture, and our everyday life. How can democracy be organised in the digital context? What are the implications of widespread automation and artificial intelligence for businesses and whole economies? What role do major internet companies play in organising and curating communication and information? The current rapid social and technological change is giving rise to enormous uncertainties \u2013 and a great need for explanations and sense-making. <\/span><\/p>\n

When we talk about the future, we cannot but talk in terms of the past and the present. Imagining the future is always mobilising the past. Hence, it is no surprise that we routinely use existing concepts and well-known phenomena to describe emerging things and developments, leading to a conceptual path dependence, of sorts: Should we understand Uber<\/em> as a taxi company, an employer or merely a software developer? Should Facebook<\/em> be understood as an algorithmically dependent platform, or as a publishing house that is liable for what it publishes? Was the file sharing site the Pirate Bay<\/em> to be regarded as an infrastructure, a storage facility or a bulletin board? This is not merely playing with words; existing notions bear normative assumptions and create regulatory implications. <\/span><\/p>\n

Emerging phenomena typically lack a name, so we apply existing words to a new thing, although they might technically not be applicable. But metaphors, as George Lakoff famously put it, are not merely figures of <\/span>speech<\/span><\/em>, they are <\/span>figures of thought<\/span><\/i><\/a>. In consequence, by talking about the ongoing transformations using the terms of the past, we are also making sense of the present future and the changes that come about with the conceptual apparatus of the past, with normative, social and economic implications.<\/span><\/p>\n

An Article Series on the Politics of Metaphors<\/h3>\n

Against this background, it is obvious why talking about the digital society and the ongoing transformations in politics, economics and culture is pervaded by metaphors. Indeed, metaphors such as <\/span>cloud<\/span><\/i>, <\/span>platform<\/span><\/i>, and <\/span>big data<\/span><\/i> are already so much part of the current discourse that they are barely recognizable as such. In the early days of the internet, <\/span>Information Superhighway<\/span><\/i> or the <\/span>World Wide Web<\/span><\/i> itself were dominant notions to describe the emerging infrastructure.<\/span><\/p>\n

The aim of this article series is to learn something about the currently evolving digital society by unlocking the metaphors we apply. Our assumption is that this will shed light on the future that we cannot know \u2013 and even the present that we do not understand. And as metaphors are not merely words, this is a genuinely political process. Every notion, every metaphor is loaded: It provides a frame of understanding and of evaluating a new phenomenon \u2013 but in many cases, we could just as easily use different notions, which in turn might be contested by competing frames and metaphors. In that way, our discourse on the digital society is contingent \u2013 it could be different. The copyright discourses have provided ample examples of this discursive struggle: <\/span>piracy<\/span><\/i> and <\/span>stealing<\/span><\/i> have strongly dominated the discourse on copyright reform, yet digital copying could easily be termed differently, with vast political and regulatory implications. But what are the less obvious implications that metaphors like <\/span>platform<\/span><\/i>, <\/span>cloud<\/span><\/i> and <\/span>big data<\/span><\/i> entail? <\/span><\/p>\n

In the coming weeks and months, we will be uncovering the hidden assumptions and concepts within our discourses of the digital, piece by piece. The series begins with an essay on <\/span>Artificial Intelligence <\/span><\/i>as a metaphor (or not?) by Christian Djeffal, followed next week by a piece on <\/span>Revolution <\/span><\/i>by Noam Tirosh and Amit Schejter. Over the course of the summer, you can expect articles on <\/span>Sharing <\/span><\/i>by Nicholas John, <\/span>Platforms <\/span><\/i>by Tarleton Gillespie and much more. This is even more important since by imagining the digital society, we are also shaping it.
\n<\/span>
\nIf you are interested in submitting a piece yourself, <\/span><\/i>send us an email<\/span><\/i><\/a> with your suggestions.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n