Skip to content

The Internet in Two Days – an experiment

16 April 2014

Undoubtedly, there is no day going by without thoughts or writings concerning the internet – but do we really know how it is actually working? Who, in fact, is well-versed with networks or protocols making our daily use of the Internet possible? Who has ever heard of congestion control or flow control? Probably only a few – provided you did not study informatics before, although both these inventions make the functioning of our today’s internet possible in the first place.

On April 9th and 10th, a group of researchers at HIIG as well as some associate researchers of the Institute had the chance to ask questions one always wanted to know about the internet but were afraid to ask. Prof. Björn Scheuermann from the department of technical informatics of the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin took two days time for us to elucidate the technical structures of the Internet in a cram course.

The history of the Internet is absolutely no straight success story but rather a story of new challenges. The solutions which were found are not magic but are based on (mostly) quite logical ideas.

On the two-day agenda were various internet layers controlling the worldwide data streams. As we now know, there is the application layer, the transport layer, the network layer, the link layer and the physical layer. What actually happens on the different layers we did examine with examples. We gained insights both into the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) – a rock of protocols in the application layer and up to now regulating data traffic for email applications and Hypertext Transport Protocol (HTTP) which is the transport protocol for websites. We discovered how much time is needed only to understand to some degree the complex functions of the Transport Control Protocol (TCP) being one of the two most common transport protocols in the internet.

The extent of what we learned is hardly to be summarized. The book “Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach” by James F. Kursoe and Keith W. Ross may be recommended to everybody who has become curious and likes to know more about technical basics of the internet since similar contents are explained there systematically (even if it is not presented as vigorous as by Prof. Scheuermann).

The impressions of the two days were as versatile as the disciplines represented in the workshop:

Out of social scientific point of view, we considered the fact interesting that in our speech about technology technical devices are treated as autonomous actors. It sounds as if routers would make decisions or as computers were able to communicate by themselves which strongly reminds on the Actor Network Theory.

Prof. Ingolf Pernice was especially impressed by the absence of security in the network infrastructure: “There is no security in the internet. Data are being lost or delayed and all in all, it sounds like an experiment and security like we know it from the material world does not exist. And still, the internet is largely accepted.” From the perspective of global constitutionalism, he added: “In terms of global rules, there is no better example as the internet. There was no global legislator and something developed which is applied by half of the world population with a fixed set of rules because it is useful.”

My personal lesson is clear: I assessed how much fun computer science can be (my memories back from school are somehow different). A rough overview of layers and protocols can be achieved quickly, however, close scrutiny may reveal overwhelming complexity of the internet today. The strains to deal with network structures is absolutely worth it if one would like to understand how the internet became what it is today.

This post is part of a weekly series of articles by doctoral candidates of the Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society. It does not necessarily represent the view of the Institute itself. For more information about the topics of these articles and associated research projects, please contact

This post represents the view of the author and does not necessarily represent the view of the institute itself. For more information about the topics of these articles and associated research projects, please contact

Theresa Züger, Dr.

Research Group Lead: Public Interest AI | AI & Society Lab

Digital & Indiscipline: HIIG Explainer videos with English subtitles

Sign up for HIIG's Monthly Digest

and receive our latest blog articles.

Man sieht in Leuchtschrift das Wort "Ethical"

Digital Ethics

Whether civil society, politics or science – everyone seems to agree that the New Twenties will be characterised by digitalisation. But what about the tension of digital ethics? How do we create a digital transformation involving society as a whole, including people who either do not have the financial means or the necessary know-how to benefit from digitalisation?  And what do these comprehensive changes in our actions mean for democracy? In this dossier we want to address these questions and offer food for thought on how we can use digitalisation for the common good.

Discover all 12 articles

Further articles

Accepting cookies

Caring about privacy but accepting cookies? Questioning the privacy paradox.

Have you ever asked yourself why you agree to privacy agreements like cookies on a website way faster and consider them less online then offline? That phenomenon is called the...

Content Moderation – What can stay, what must go?

The research project "Ethics of Digitalisation" has developed rules for algorhithmic content moderation in social networks.

Is the new EU directive for sustainability in AI a toothless paper tiger or a sharp and hungry lion?

A lion for sustainable AI: How to support a new standard for sustainability reporting?

The Sustainability of AI is missing proper standards. EU's CSRD might be a new directive. But is it a toothless paper tiger or a sharp lion?