Start-up Hacks: The Bay Area versus Berlin. A comparison of two vibrant startup-scenes.
In this article, HIIG PhD candidate and UC Berkeley visiting research scholar Martina Dopfer looks into the vibrant startup-scene of the Bay Area and compares it to Berlin. Although there are things to be learned from the Bay Area like founding optimism or scalable business models, Martina notices that Berlin is ahead of the U.S., e.g., when it comes to the awareness of users and their data.
Good fortune had it that I got the chance to go to UC Berkeley as visiting research scholar. Here I am, working on my PhD on startup business model development. In the course of my research over the past couple of years, I have spoken to many Berlin-based entrepreneurs. Thanks to their openness, I got to know the many challenges and obstacles they face. For one, they have to deal with a scarcity of investors willing to invest in business models that do not promise for quick revenues. Second, when it comes to the founding culture in Berlin, the German fear of failure often dictates risk aversion. While the entrepreneurial scene itself is still growing, besides 6Wunderkinder, Berlin has only just started to write big exit stories. Lastly, German-based startups are often limited by policies and regulations, for instance, when it comes to data regulations.
Securing funding is not a piece of cake in the U.S. either
This in mind, I arrived in the Bay Area and started first interview rounds with founders, program managers of accelerators and incubators, and entrepreneurship lecturers.
One of the first insights I gathered was that securing funding – especially seed funding – is not a piece of cake in the U.S. either. To the contrary, the average entrepreneur contacts about seventy potential investors before a first “maybe”. One startup founder explicitly highlighted: “Only after I had spoken to number eighty, the first positive replies regarding our small investment of 250.000 USD started to come in.” Notably, and probably similar to Germany, many seed investments are made by the entrepreneurs’ close ties, that is, family members, friends, or – and that seems to be a recurring theme – by friends from previous MBA or postgraduate programs. Put differently, previous Ivy league students certainly have a competitive advantage when they start up their first companies.
Business models play a minor role to obtain funding
At the same time, business models themselves seem to play a minor role in persuading investors. Instead, when I asked the founders about their primary goals, they emphasized they wanted to increase reach as quickly as possible. In order to attract their potential customers, they build on all kinds of marketing means ranging from online marketing to flyers, parties and events. Only rarely do they have their revenue model defined, even less so their target group or final value proposition. Generally, it is much more about proposing a potential value than capturing it. Additionally, independent of whether the business is about hardware or software, the sale of data is a primary objective. While the entrepreneurs seldomly have a clear plan for data capitalization, this does not seem to become an obstacle to obtain funding.
Once funding has been secured, a lot of the money is invested in huge marketing campaigns. For instance, both Uber and Lyft have managed to establish a reliable network of drivers for private rides throughout the Bay Area. In December 2015, Uber was valued 62.5 Billion US Dollars and in January 2016, Lyft‘s valuation reached 5.5 Billion US Dollars. Following those valuations, both companies started to cross-finance their cheap rides. Both UberPool and LyftLine offer car rides shared amongst at least two clients that go into a similar direction. These riders profit from price drops up to forty percent. Put differently, great investments like the 500 million US Dollars Lyft raised this year, or the 2.1 Billion US Dollars Uber received past December – send a signal to the entire startup scene. That is, huge valuations are possible and generous marketing budgets can be of benefit to everyone!
Optimism dominates the Bay Area
On a meta-perspective, one could even presume these affordable rides help to transmit an overall founding optimism.
I have really come to appreciate the positive attitude and openness towards just “trying your luck with an idea”. We have all heard it before, and I will not go deeply into it again. Still, I confirm the positive attitude towards trying, founding, and even failing that shapes the Bay Area. Failure is not regarded as the end of the world but a chance to start afresh. At the same time, the scene is increasingly aware of falling stock prices and expects cuts in cash flows any time now. I have also spoken to auditors and venture capitalists, and they often believe that “no one can really estimate when the bubble bursts”. Even the best forecasters confess that their risk predictions will always be limited.
Yet, all this is quickly forgotten when you meet Mark Zuckerberg in Chinatown buying dumplings or pass by Marissa Myer’s house built amidst her altogether three Palo Alto properties. The chances to exit big – real big – are transmitted all around the Bay Area.
Data regulations remain widely ignored
Meanwhile, regulations, policies and data protection remain topics widely ignored. About eighty percent of the founders I talked to intend to sell the user data they generate. However, they became really vague when I asked them about the safety of private user information. Common replies included: “We are just gonna accumulate data so that it does not say anything about a single person,” or “The user data will be entirely anonymized.” Additionally, and despite articles saying otherwise, I noticed that many people in the Bay Area are not aware of what happens to their data. It seems to be generally accepted that Google knows it all, Facebook rules every university campus, and Uber drives you anywhere.
Taken together, there is still much inspiration Berlin can get from the Bay Area. But the entrepreneurial landscape in Berlin has already come a long way, and with just a little more optimism regarding its own potential, Berlin will certainly be able to tell some great success stories of its own soon.
This post is part of a weekly series of articles by doctoral canditates of the Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society. It does not necessarily represent the view of the Institute itself. For more information about the topics of these articles and asssociated research projects, please contact email@example.com.
This post represents the view of the author and does not necessarily represent the view of the institute itself. For more information about the topics of these articles and associated research projects, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Sign up for HIIG's Monthly Digest
and receive our latest blog articles.
When the Platform Alternatives project began its research of Europe’s platform economy in 2020, the team set out to understand the structural effects of the large American platforms and the strategies of their European competitors. What they found was a highly diverse and active landscape, where scaling at all cost and market domination were not necessarily core concerns. Now, two years on, the question of how to regulate large platforms still dominates the public and policy debates. The contributions gathered here, however, suggest that it would also be of societal value if mainstream discourse learned to take a closer look at the variety of organisational solutions of existing European platforms. Not only to regulate them better but also to help them prosper into true alternatives in the global market.
How does the design practice of digital technology need to be fundamentally changed to create a more inclusive digital future? Adriaan Odendaal & Karla Zavala Barreda on creating the idea...
How can we communicate digitalisation in SMEs in a appropriate way for the target group? 4 core characteristics of sustainable support formats for long-term success.
Why do translation programmes or chatbots often contain discriminatory tendencies towards gender or race? Here is an easy guide to understand how bias natural language processing works.