Skip to content

Finding design patterns in law: An exploratory approach

Author: Koulu, R., Peters, A., & Pohle, J.
Published in:
Year: 2021
Type: Working paper

Currently, the importance of design is recognized across society and advocated for in ethical guidelines surrounding the development of information systems. The concept of design patterns was originally introduced by design theorist Christopher Alexander, to identify and collect reusable design solutions for desired social interaction in physical spaces. The concept was then adopted by software developers to enhance problem solving through collecting functional design solutions. Our exploration is motivated by the notion of law as abstract architecture meant to regulate social interaction. We hope to transfer the concept of design patterns to law, as such analytical practice would facilitate the identification of recurring good solutions across different fields and, ultimately, the repeated practice of pattern recognition would contribute to law’s proactive capabilities. We engage in an exploratory approach to describe the conceptual evolution of design patterns from architecture to software and to legal design. We discuss the process of pattern recognition as a collective iterative process and then proceed to identify three examples of legal design patterns in law. Following this exploration, we perceive design patterns particularly useful for identifying procedural structures and conclude by discussing the advantages of the approach for socio-legal research on proceduralization and automation of law.

Visit publication


Connected HIIG researchers

Riikka Koulu, Prof. Dr.

Associated Researcher: Data, Actors, Infrastructures

Amadeus Peters

Former fellow: Data, actors, infrastructures

Jörg Pohle, Dr.

Head of Research Program: Actors, Data and Infrastructures

  • Open Access
  • Transdisciplinary

Explore current HIIG Activities

Research issues in focus

HIIG is currently working on exciting topics. Learn more about our interdisciplinary pioneering work in public discourse.