Skip to content

Establishing the Argumentative DNA of International Law: Of Transatlantic Divides and Universal Unity: A Cubistic Perspective on the Rule of Treaty Interpretation and its Underlying Legal Culture(s)

Author: Djeffal, C.
Published in: Transnational Legal Theory, 5, 128-157
Year: 2014
Type: Academic articles

There is an increasing tendency to frame international legal discourse in terms of regional designations. We then speak for example of European or American approaches or of Latin American international law. This development could seriously impact the perception of international law. The present article tries to deepen the understanding of what happens when we think about international law and international legal theory in national or regional terms. In an exemplary fashion the article looks at different approaches to treaty interpretation, which have been framed as European and American to see how this impacts on international legal discourse. In a first step, the two approaches at the Vienna Conference on the Law of Treaties will be explained. Secondly, two narratives will be developed describing what happened in Vienna in turn as European/American or as international legal discourse. The third part reflects on the consequences of framing concepts and theories this way with particular reference to the rules on treaty interpretation.

Visit publication


Connected HIIG researchers

Christian Djeffal, Prof. Dr.

Former Associated Researcher | Project Leader

    Explore current HIIG Activities

    Research issues in focus

    HIIG is currently working on exciting topics. Learn more about our interdisciplinary pioneering work in public discourse.