Skip to content
169 HD – AI is neutral – 1

Myth: AI will end discrimination

10 May 2021| doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4745653

As an allegedly objective state-of-the-art technology, there are hopes that AI may overcome human weaknesses. Some people believe that AI might be able to gain privileged access to knowledge, free of human biases and errors and thus end discrimination by realizing all in all fair and objective decisions.
We approach the de-mystification of this claim by looking at concrete examples of how AI (re)produces inequalities and connect those to several aspects which help to illustrate socio-technical entanglements. Drawing on a range of critical scholars, we argue that this simplifying myth might even be dangerous and point out what to do about it.

Myth

AI will end discrimination (or is at least less discriminatory than fallible and unfair human beings).

As part of society, AI is deeply rooted in it and as such not separable from structures of discrimination. Due to this socio-technical embeddedness, AI cannotmake discrimination disappear by itself.

Watch the talk

Material

Presentation slides
CORE READINGS

Benjamin, R. (2019a): Captivating Technology. Race, Carceral Technoscience, and Liberatory Imagination in Everyday Life. Durham: Duke University Press.

Benjamin, R. (2019b): Race after technology: abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Cambridge: UKPolity.

Criado-Perez, C. (2020): Unsichtbare Frauen. Wie eine von Daten beherrschte Welt die Hälfte der Bevölkerung ignoriert. München: btb Verlag.

D’Ignazio, C.; Klein, L. F. (2020): Data Feminism.
Strong ideas series Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England: The MIT Press.

Buolamwini, J.; Gebru, T. (2018): Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. In: Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 81. Paper präsentiert bei der Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 1–15.

ADDITIONAL READINGS

Eubanks, V. (2017): Automating inequality. How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. First Edition. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press

O’Neil, C. (2016): Weapons of math destruction. How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. First edition. New York: Crown.

Zuboff, S. (2020): The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Fight for a Human Future at the new Frontier of Power. First Trade Paperback Edition. New York: PublicAffairs.

Cave, S.; Dihal, K. (2020): The Whiteness of AI. In: Philosophy & Technology 33(4), 685–703.
UNICORN IN THE FIELD

Epicenter.works
AlgorithmWatch
netzforma* e.V.

About the authors

Miriam Fahimi, Digital Age Research Center (D!ARC), University of Klagenfurt

Miriam, MA BSc is Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellow within the ITN-ETN Marie Curie Training Network „NoBIAS – Artificial Intelligence without Bias“, funded by the EU through Horizon 2020 at the Digital Age Research Center (D!ARC), University of Klagenfurt. She is also a PhD candidate in Science and Technology Studies at the University of Klagenfurt, supervised by Katharina Kinder-Kurlanda. Her research interests include algorithmic fairness, philosophy of science, science and technology studies, and feminist theory.

@feminasmus

Phillip Lücking, Gender/Diversity in Informatics Systems (GeDIS), University of Kassel

Phillip is a research associate and PhD candidate at the University of Kassel. He graduated from Bielefeld University in Intelligent Systems (MSc). His research interest encompasses machine learning and robotics in relation to their societal impacts, as well as questions on how these technologies can be utilized for social good.


Why, AI?

This post is part of our project “Why, AI?”. It is a learning space which helps you to find out more about the myths and truths surrounding automation, algorithms, society and ourselves. It is continuously being filled with new contributions.

Explore all myths


This post represents the view of the author and does not necessarily represent the view of the institute itself. For more information about the topics of these articles and associated research projects, please contact info@hiig.de.

Sign up for HIIG's Monthly Digest

and receive our latest blog articles.

Man sieht in Leuchtschrift das Wort "Ethical"

Digital Ethics

Whether civil society, politics or science – everyone seems to agree that the New Twenties will be characterised by digitalisation. But what about the tension of digital ethics? How do we create a digital transformation involving society as a whole, including people who either do not have the financial means or the necessary know-how to benefit from digitalisation?  And what do these comprehensive changes in our actions mean for democracy? In this dossier we want to address these questions and offer food for thought on how we can use digitalisation for the common good.

Discover all 12 articles

Further articles

Federal German states have their own approach of AI Policy

ArtificiaI Intelligence made in X: The German AI policy landscape

AI is also discussed at the subnational level. We wondered: Why do German federal states feel the need to also issue AI policies for themselves?

Digital Democracy needs deliberation

Designing Digital Democracy

Designing rules for digital democracy is difficult. Private platforms' orders imperfectly shape what can be said online, as new ideas for more democracy on platforms through deliberative elements are being...

Shaping AI in the interests of employees

Shaping AI in the interests of employees

AI offers opportunities and risks for employees. But what can managers and works councils do to enable potential positive effects and avoid negative effects?