Skip to content
169 HD – AI is inaccessible.-2
02 June 2021| doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4811512

Myth: AI understands me, but I can’t understand it

Everyone can and should understand how AI works, so that – rather than be intimidated or misled by algorithmic decision-making – we can contribute multiple perspectives to designing and implementing the systems that impact us all differently.

Myth

AI understands me, but I can’t understand it.

AI ist NOT smarter than us. AI should be understandable and accessible.

Watch the talk

Material

Folien der Präsentation
SCHLÜSSELLITERATUR

Crawford, K. & Paglen, T. (2019, September 19). Excavating AI: The Politics of Images in Machine Learning Training Sets.

Timnit Gebru. (2021, April 14). The Hierarchy of Knowledge in Machine Learning & Related Fields and Its Consequences.

Zubarev, V. (2018, November 21). Machine Learning for Everyone.

ZUSATZLITERATUR

Griffith, C. (2017). Visualizing Algorithms.

Kogan, G. (n.d.). Neural networks. Retrieved 18 May 2021.

McPherson, T., & Parham, M. (2019, October 24). ‘What is a Feminist Lab?’ Symposium.
UNICORN IN THE FIELD

Algorithmic Justice League
Color Coded LA
Data Nutrition Project
School of Machines, Making, & Make-Believe

About the author

Sarah Ciston, Fellow | HIIG

Sarah Ciston (she/they) is a Virtual Fellow at the Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society, and a Mellon Fellow and PhD Candidate in Media Arts + Practice at University of Southern California. Their research investigates how to bring intersectionality to artificial intelligence by employing queer, feminist, and anti-racist ethics and tactics. They lead Creative Code Collective—a student community for co-learning programming using approachable, interdisciplinary strategies. Their projects include a machine-learning interface that ‘rewrites’ the inner critic and a chatbot that explains feminism to online misogynists. They are currently developing a library of digital-print zines on Intersectional AI.

@sarahciston


Why, AI?

This post is part of our project “Why, AI?”. It is a learning space which helps you to find out more about the myths and truths surrounding automation, algorithms, society and ourselves. It is continuously being filled with new contributions.

Explore all myths


This post represents the view of the author and does not necessarily represent the view of the institute itself. For more information about the topics of these articles and associated research projects, please contact info@hiig.de.

Explore Research issue in focus

Du siehst Eisenbahnschienen. Die vielen verschiedenen Abzweigungen symbolisieren die Entscheidungsmöglichkeiten von Künstlicher Intelligenz in der Gesellschaft. Manche gehen nach oben, unten, rechts. Manche enden auch in Sackgassen. Englisch: You see railway tracks. The many different branches symbolise the decision-making possibilities of artificial intelligence and society. Some go up, down, to the right. Some also end in dead ends.

Artificial intelligence and society

The future of artificial Intelligence and society operates in diverse societal contexts. What can we learn from its political, social and cultural facets?

Sign up for HIIG's Monthly Digest

and receive our latest blog articles.

Further articles

two Quechuas, sitting on green grass and looking at their smartphones, symbolising What are the indigenous perspectives of digitalisation? Quechuas in Peru show openness, challenges, and requirements to grow their digital economies

Exploring digitalisation: Indigenous perspectives from Puno, Peru

What are the indigenous perspectives of digitalisation? Quechuas in Peru show openness, challenges, and requirements to grow their digital economies.

eine mehrfarbige Baumlandschaft von oben, die eine bunte digitale Publikationslandschaft symbolisiert

Diamond OA: For a colourful digital publishing landscape

The blog post raises awareness of new financial pitfalls in the Open Access transformation and proposes a collaborative funding structure for Diamond OA in Germany.

a pile of crumpled up newspapers symbolising the spread of disinformation online

Disinformation: Are we really overestimating ourselves?

How aware are we of the effects and the reach of disinformation online and does the public discourse provide a balanced picture?