Making sense of our connected world
Myth: AI Models are abstract and do not need personal data
In supervised machine learning, models are based on abstractions from training data. The models themselves, while structurally influenced by the training data, do not contain the data themselves. It therefore seems reasonable to treat data they contain as (almost) anonymous. However, this is not true. Research has shown that deanonymization is possible under certain circumstances. Therefore, the models have to be considered as partially containing personal data and data protection law has to be taken into account when developing AI models to safeguard data subjects.
Myth
AI Models are abstract and do not need personal data.
AI models are an abstraction which may or may not contain personal data. Data protection law needs to be taken into account.
Watch the talk
Material
| Presentation Slides | |
| KEY LITERATURE Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C. & Shmatikov, V. (2016). Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models. Al-Rubaie, M. & Chang, J. M. (2019). Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: Threats and Solutions. EEE Security & Privacy, 17(2), 49-58. Liu, B., Ding, M., Shaham, S., Rahayu, W., Farokhi, F. & Lin, Z. (2021). When Machine Learning Meets Privacy: A Survey and Outlook. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(2), 1-36. |
About the author
Christoph Sorge
Professor, Saarland University (Chair of Legal Informatics), Saarbrücken, Germany
Christoph Sorge received his PhD in computer science from Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. He then joined the NEC Laboratories Europe, Network Research Division, as a research scientist. From 2010, Christoph was an assistant professor (“Juniorprofessor”) for Network Security at the University of Paderborn. He joined Saarland University in 2014, and is now a full professor of Legal Informatics at that university. While his primary affiliation is with the Faculty of Law, he is also a co-opted professor of computer science. He is an associated member of the CISPA – Helmholtz Center for Information Security, a senior fellow of the German Research Institute for Public Administration, and a board member of the German Association for Computing in the Judiciary. His research area is the intersection of computer science and law, with a focus on data protection.
This post represents the view of the author and does not necessarily represent the view of the institute itself. For more information about the topics of these articles and associated research projects, please contact info@hiig.de.
Artificial intelligence and society
Sign up for HIIG's Monthly Digest
and receive our latest blog articles.
My robot did my homework: AI applications and creativity at the university
Is AI a creativity killer? We consider whether and how generative AI can be used to foster creativity at universities.
Data breaches: Does the GDPR help?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the data breach notification obligation in the GDPR given its objectives?
Public Interest AI – Quo vadis?
A lot has happened since the founding of our research group on public interest-oriented AI, in science, society and politics. We provide an insight.