Skip to content

Digital Society Blog

Making sense of our connected world

Webseite – WHY_AI_Christoph Sorge

Myth: AI Models are abstract and do not need personal data

30 August 2021| doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5243288

In supervised machine learning, models are based on abstractions from training data. The models themselves, while structurally influenced by the training data, do not contain the data themselves. It therefore seems reasonable to treat data they contain as (almost) anonymous. However, this is not true. Research has shown that deanonymization is possible under certain circumstances. Therefore, the models have to be considered as partially containing personal data and data protection law has to be taken into account when developing AI models to safeguard data subjects.

Myth

AI Models are abstract and do not need personal data.

 

AI models are an abstraction which may or may not contain personal data. Data protection law needs to be taken into account.

Watch the talk

Material

Presentation Slides
KEY LITERATURE

Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C. & Shmatikov, V. (2016). Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models.

Al-Rubaie, M. & Chang, J. M. (2019). Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: Threats and Solutions. EEE Security & Privacy, 17(2), 49-58.

Liu, B., Ding, M., Shaham, S., Rahayu, W., Farokhi, F. & Lin, Z. (2021). When Machine Learning Meets Privacy: A Survey and Outlook. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(2), 1-36.

About the author

Foto: Oliver Dietze

Christoph Sorge

Professor, Saarland University (Chair of Legal Informatics), Saarbrücken, Germany

Christoph Sorge received his PhD in computer science from Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. He then joined the NEC Laboratories Europe, Network Research Division, as a research scientist. From 2010, Christoph was an assistant professor (“Juniorprofessor”) for Network Security at the University of Paderborn. He joined Saarland University in 2014, and is now a full professor of Legal Informatics at that university. While his primary affiliation is with the Faculty of Law, he is also a co-opted professor of computer science. He is an associated member of the CISPA – Helmholtz Center for Information Security, a senior fellow of the German Research Institute for Public Administration, and a board member of the German Association for Computing in the Judiciary. His research area is the intersection of computer science and law, with a focus on data protection.

@legalinf

This post represents the view of the author and does not necessarily represent the view of the institute itself. For more information about the topics of these articles and associated research projects, please contact info@hiig.de.

HIIG Journals

Sign up for HIIG's Monthly Digest

and receive our latest blog articles.

Future Events

Further articles

Wahlkompass Digitales 2021

Lack of digital policy in the truel of the chancellor candidates – An emancipation of the electorate

nsights into the projects in the field of digital policy are not yet available in the truels. However, if you would like to find out more, you have come to...

OpenAI

When will the first AI top the New York Times bestseller list?

Language generators based on artificial intelligence are producing increasingly convincing texts. This led us to wonder: Could an AI guest-author an article in Encore? This AI-written text is the result...

Virtual volunteering – How young people use digital technologies for the common good

Digitalisation is giving rise to new fields and forms of engagement. In the pandemic, solidarity practices gained relevance, organisations were challenged.