Games Research at HIIG Hits the Road
In recent months, research into innovations in games and gamification has been a focus in our empirical work at the HIIG. In a case study on innovation and imitation in the games sector, we interviewed game designers, developers, graphic artists, producers and lawyers from both small indie teams and big studios. We were interested in how they, in their daily practice, handle the fine line between being inspired by other games on the one hand and – blatantly or unintentionally – copycatting successful games on the other (see also this blog post). A second group of researchers is building up an investigation into the ways gamification is improving online learning and MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses).
See this discussion paper for their prior research into MOOCs.
Starting today, games research at HIIG hits the road. Over the course of two months, we will present and discuss our findings and related issues at a series of workshops, conferences and public events:
22 April 2015
Today, we co-host a workshop on the challenges of game preservation with a focus on copyright. Archiving and preserving games as part of our cultural heritage has proven to be difficult for museums and libraries not only for technical reasons, but also for legal obstacles. In the context of current debates about copyright reforms within the EU, we will discuss possible solutions for improving this situation. HIIG’s Rike Maier will substantiate the discussion by giving an input about the related issue of orphaned works.
23 April 2015
Panel at Quo Vadis/International Games Week “Copies, Clones and Genre Building – Innovation and Imitation practices in the Games Industry”
At this week’s Quo Vadis, we will enact our research project on imitation and innovation in a nutshell: we bringt together a developer, a producer and a lawyer together to discuss the fine line between inspiration and imitation. Lies will also present first findings of our study.
5 May 2015
We will deliver the first coherent presentation of our research findings at this year’s re:publica. In a 30 min talk will try to give a short history on the relation of copycatting and innovation in the games industry, and then dive into the findings of our interview study. If you like both Pong and Flappy Bird, don’t miss this event.
15 May 2015
Academic Panel at DiGRA 2015 „International Cultures of Creativity and Imitation“
At this year’s Digital Games Research Conference, we co-host a panel on international cultures of creativity and imitation together with Tom Phillips from the University of East Anglia. Building on recent discourses and complaints about copycatting, researchers from UK, Australia, USA and Germany will present findings from their respective studies on the relationship between creativity and imitation in the games sectors. The panel will also address how this correlates with legal issues of copyright, intellectual property, trademarks, and more general notions of “appropriate” practice in game development.
9 June 2015
In June, Medienboard Berlin Brandenburg and HIIG host an afternoon workshop on innovation in the games sector between protection and freedom. The workshop will be held in german.
24 June 2015
The final event in this series will be a games-related event in our talk format Digitaler Salon. In June, we will discuss how gamification and serious games currently spread across fields like education and health and how this changes the ways we learn and conceive ourselves.
This post represents the view of the author and does not necessarily represent the view of the institute itself. For more information about the topics of these articles and associated research projects, please contact email@example.com.
Sign up for HIIG's Monthly Digest
and receive our latest blog articles.
Whether civil society, politics or science – everyone seems to agree that the New Twenties will be characterised by digitalisation. But what about the tension of digital ethics? How do we create a digital transformation involving society as a whole, including people who either do not have the financial means or the necessary know-how to benefit from digitalisation? And what do these comprehensive changes in our actions mean for democracy? In this dossier we want to address these questions and offer food for thought on how we can use digitalisation for the common good.
Why is Artificial Intelligence so commonly depicted as a machine with a human brain? This article shows why one misleading metaphor became so prevalent.
Barriers in our physical environment are still widespread. While AI systems could eventually support detecting them, it first needs open training data. Here we provide a dataset for detecting steps...
How can we address the many inequalities in access to digital resources and lack of digital skills that were revealed by the COVID-19 pandemic?