Exploring Doradical Futures with Sputniko!
This blog post reflects upon the work of Sputniko!. Sputniko! is a Designer/Artist who currently works at MIT Media Lab as Assistant Professor of the Design Fictions Group. Recently, she gave a keynote talk at the Transmediale Festival in Berlin where I had the chance to conduct a short interview with her.
In her work Sputniko! is playing with the “what if” question to design alternative futures. Using technology, she presents an artistic vision of how the world could be and invites viewers to engage in a discussion. Imagine an alternative future where men have a better understanding of what it is like to be female and the other way round. Can technology help to bridge that gap? Menstruation Machine – a wearable construct that stimulates the abdominal area with electrodes to imitate pain and drips “blood” from a container – offers a glimpse into one aspect of being female. Penis Cybernetique – a wearable phallic prosthetic that reacts to the heart rate – sheds light on what it might be like to be “cockproud”. Technology allows moving beyond the usual range of experiences but also serves as a tool for empowerment. No one stops a smart girl from sending a Moonwalk Machine to the moon in order to leave behind the missing mark of a high heel footprint.
Superficially, tunes like Google Song or Skype Song perfectly fit the pop culture conventions. Yet there is a subtle difference. They use the very language of popular culture to inject questions about social issues. They challenge behaviour patterns which the generation that is submerged in ubiquitous digital technologies engages in, often lacking the distance to critically reflect upon it.
In my interview with Sputniko! she explains her approach to questioning the use of technology in everyday life: ‘I am very interested in hacking the current system or the current language because the current world is more hackable, the media is hackable, and spreading ideas is more hackable.’
Many of Sputniko!’s works are more than simply design objects that have been given a story which is portrayed in a music video. The mission of these objects and stories is to trigger discussions. One interesting discussion, however, was unleashed not by a design object but by Sputniko! tweeting about the inappropriateness of the cover of a Japanese Artificial Intelligence Journal. The cover depicted a cartoon-like drawing of a female cleaning robot. The discussion that started off by critically looking at the portrayal of feminine qualities in a stereotypical context turned into a “shitstorm” against Sputniko!. This is yet another example showing that even though technology is rapidly progressing and confronting us with new devices that offer new opportunities, critical reflections and discussions are very much needed and should not stay behind the technological developments.
Inspired by the Japanese cartoon character Doraemon, which pulls out different gadgets from the future out of a special pocket, Sputniko! coined the term “doradical futures” – a mixture of “Doraemon”, “radical”, and “critical” – to describe the philosophy behind her work.
In designing these “doradical futures” Sputniko! often collaborates with scientists, so I asked her about what she thinks of the current developments in science and whether scientists make use of what the internet has to offer. Sputniko! sees a lot of potential in citizen science: ‘Something that requires a lot of time and tedious effort scientists can definitely get help with from the public on the internet, so that is really different and new I think.’ So how does Sputniko! envision further “doradical futures”? She sees them dominated by biotechnological issues and suggests that we might soon be able to choose the colour of our blood as a fashion statement. And what are the next “doradical futures” that Sputniko! will pull out of her pocket? The answer lies behind a secretive smile. Maybe it has something to do with cats on roombas.
This post is part of a weekly series of articles by doctoral canditates of the Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society. It does not necessarily represent the view of the Institute itself. For more information about the topics of these articles and asssociated research projects, please contact email@example.com.
This post represents the view of the author and does not necessarily represent the view of the institute itself. For more information about the topics of these articles and associated research projects, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Sign up for HIIG's Monthly Digest
and receive our latest blog articles.
Whether civil society, politics or science – everyone seems to agree that the New Twenties will be characterised by digitalisation. But what about the tension of digital ethics? How do we create a digital transformation involving society as a whole, including people who either do not have the financial means or the necessary know-how to benefit from digitalisation? And what do these comprehensive changes in our actions mean for democracy? In this dossier we want to address these questions and offer food for thought on how we can use digitalisation for the common good.
AI is also discussed at the subnational level. We wondered: Why do German federal states feel the need to also issue AI policies for themselves?
Designing rules for digital democracy is difficult. Private platforms' orders imperfectly shape what can be said online, as new ideas for more democracy on platforms through deliberative elements are being...