BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//wp-events-plugin.com//7.2.3.1//EN
TZID:Europe/Berlin
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Berlin
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:695@hiig.de
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20190515T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20190515T140000
DTSTAMP:20190513T143555Z
URL:https://www.hiig.de/en/events/critical-ai-studies-the-epistemic-ensemb
 le-of-deep-learning-lunch-talks/
SUMMARY:Critical AI Studies & The Epistemic Ensemble of Deep Learning | Lu
 nch Talks
DESCRIPTION:\nProf. Jonathan Roberge and Prof. Michael Castelle are guest r
 esearchers at the Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Societ
 y in May. In their joint Brown Bag Lunch\, they argue for the need for Cri
 tical AI Studies and ask what epistemic categories are needed to understan
 d Machine Learning. The lectures will be held in English. If you are inter
 ested\, please register using the form below.\n\n&nbsp\;\nLunch talk with 
 Jonathan Roberge &amp\; Michael Castelle\nWednesday\, 15 May 2019 · 1 pm 
 · HIIG Kitchen\n&nbsp\;\n\nJonathan Roberge\nCritical AI Studies. Making 
 the Case for CAIS\nAutomated technologies populating today’s online worl
 d rely on social expectations about how “smart” they appear to be. Alg
 orithmic processing\, as well as bias and missteps in the course of their 
 development\, all come to shape a cultural realm that in turn determines 
 what they come to be about. It is our contention that a robust analytical 
 frame could be derived from a culturally-driven STS while focusing on Cal
 lon’s concept of translation. Excitement and apprehensions must find a s
 pecific language to move past a state of latency. Translations are thus c
 ontextual and highly performative\, transforming justifications into legit
 imate claims\, translators into discursive entrepreneurs\, and power rela
 tions into new forms of governance and governmentality. In this presentati
 on\, we discuss three cases in which AI was deciphered to the public: i) 
 the Montreal Declaration for a Responsible Development of Artificial Intel
 ligence\, held as a prime example of how stakeholders manage to establish
  the terms of the debate on ethical AI while avoiding substantive commitm
 ent\; ii) Mark Zuckerberg’s 2018 congressional hearing\, where he constr
 ued machine learning as the solution to the many problems the platform mi
 ght encounter\; and iii) the normative renegotiations surrounding the grad
 ual introduction of “killer robots” in military engagements. Of inter
 est are not only the rational arguments put forward\, but also the rhetori
 cal maneuvers deployed. Through the examination of the ramifications of t
 hese translations\, we intend to show how they are constructed in face of 
 and in relation to forms of criticisms\, thus revealing the highly cybern
 etic deployment of AI technologies.\nJonathan Roberge is Associate Profess
 or of Cultural and Urban Sociology at the Institut National de la Recherch
 e Scientifique\, where he also holds the Canada Research Chair in Digital
  Culture. He is among the very first scholars in North America to have cri
 tically focused on the production of algorithms\, a research agenda which
  culminated into a foundational text in this domain entitled Algorithmic 
 Cultures (Routledge\, 2016\, translated into German at Transcript Verlag\,
  2017). He currently works on a manuscript entitled The Cultural Life of 
 Machine Learning to be out early in 2020 at Palgrave MacMillan (together w
 ith Micheal Castelle).\n\nMichael Castelle\nExperiment\, Vector\, and Los
 s: The Epistemic Ensemble of Deep Learning\nThe fast-growing research fie
 ld of deep learning — the use of convolutional and/or recurrent neura
 l network architectures in machine learning — has been hailed as a “r
 evolution” by researchers and practitioners\, one which is sometimes co
 nsidered “unreasonably effective” and associated with a “black art
 ” of internalist knowledge. At the same time\, these models have been c
 riticized by social scientists for their interpretative opacity\, depend
 ence on classification schemes\, and capacity to reproduce social biases.
  Which methodologies are most appropriate for understanding these techniq
 ues and their increased deployment in everyday sociotechnical life? In t
 his presentation\, by focusing on three distinctive features of deep lear
 ning—its experimental method\; its vectorial or ‘structuralist’ on
 tology\; and the role of the ‘loss’ function through which model para
 meters are optimized—I will argue that a combination of historical\, e
 pistemological\, semiotic and interactional approaches are necessary for 
 understanding deep learning. This allows one to understand this emergent
  field not as a revolutionary disruption but as a genre of technoscience 
 which synthesizes aspects of past epistemic breaks—in this case behavio
 rism\, cognitivism\, structuralism\, connectionism\, and machine learning
  (as well as aspects of game theory and cybernetics)—together into what
  I call an epistemic ensemble. This resulting perspective can permit ri
 cher engagements with these techniques on the part of social scientists a
 nd humanists\, who can thus draw on a rich historiography of previous cr
 oss-disciplinary engagements and\, I argue\, actually apply their own exi
 sting theoretical apparatuses to contribute to this unstable field for so
 me future ‘neural’ social sciences and/or humanities.\n&nbsp\;\nMicha
 el Castelle is Assistant Professor at University of Warwick’s Centre f
 or Interdisciplinary Methodologies. His work is at the intersection of t
 he sociohistorical studies of science and technology and the economic soc
 iology of markets\, and is working to draw connections between present-d
 ay research developments in AI (such as generative network architectures
  and attention models) and 20th-century theories of language\, learning\,
  and creativity. He has written for the journals Philosophy &amp\; Techn
 ology\, Economy and Society\, Computational Culture\, and has presented at
  EMNLP (Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing) and SIGCHI (Sp
 ecial Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction). He holds degrees in
  both Sociology (Ph.D.\, University of Chicago) and Computer Science (Sc.
 B.\, Brown University) as well as professional experience in computer gra
 phics\, computational neuroscience\, and neurology.
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.hiig.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/b
 ag-bags-brown-21436-Cropped.jpg
CATEGORIES:Exploring Digital Spheres
LOCATION:Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society\, Französische Straß
 e 9\, Berlin\, 10117\, Germany
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=Französische Straße 9\, B
 erlin\, 10117\, Germany;X-APPLE-RADIUS=100;X-TITLE=Humboldt Institute for 
 Internet and Society:geo:0,0
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Berlin
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Berlin
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20190331T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
END:VCALENDAR