Skip to content

RESEARCH IN FOCUS

Platform governance

Platform Governance refers to the rules, regulations, and framework within which digital platforms in our society are managed. This includes social networks, online services, digital marketplaces, or messaging services, for example. These digital platform ecosystems facilitate the exchange of information, goods, and services in our daily lives. As an integral part of our modern communication, they also have a profound impact on public discourse and economic processes. In our research on sustainable platform governance, we therefore examine how entrepreneurial goals, individual rights, and societal values can be harmonised in these online communication spaces. This includes questions related to online platform regulation, competition law, freedom of speech, individual autonomy, and (democratically anchored) decision-making.

ABOUT OUR RESEARCH

How do we communicate online? Who determines the rules for online discourse? The digital transformation of communication processes has given rise to a new form of public discourse, influenced in part by the rules and designs of social media and other digital platforms.

Good platform governance

One of the main challenges in creating a legitimate platform governance model is to strike a balance between promoting open communication and curbing problematic content, such as disinformation, hate speech, or scams. Within our research, we examine how such rules can be established, enforced, and democratically safeguarded. We also consider how algorithms and community guidelines influence the behavior and interactions of users within digital platform ecosystems. How can rules and practices be established to allow users to communicate safely and freely? How can digital platforms remain innovative and market-oriented while also contributing to the well-being of society?

The EU has also introduced (or is on the verge of introducing) a series of new regulations for online platforms, including the Digital Services Act (DSA), the Digital Markets Act (DMA), the Data Act (DA), and the AI Act. In interconnected projects, we investigate the impact of these normative platform governance approaches on the online discourse environment. What law prevails in these digital platform ecosystems? Is it the law of the platform operators or that of the EU and national states? And what about outside of Europe?

We are particularly interested in phenomena like online hate speech or the influence of recommendation algorithms and automated communication. The focus is on how the power of digital platforms affects individual and societal decision-making processes and social cohesion.

From the HIIG Channel

IN a nutshell

José van Dijck: Europe & responsible platform societies

The struggles of digitalisation between competing ideological systems and actors raise questions of responsibility.

Digital Salon

Lost in regulation

How can the tension between free expression and disinformation on social media platforms be resolved?

Insights & Power

Internet scientists meet platform decision-makers

How can the tension between free expression and disinformation on social media platforms be resolved?

From the Press

Feature with Matthias C. Kettemann on independent monitoring bodies for social media.

Feature with Matthias C. Kettemann on the revolution in the German streaming landscape.

Feature with Wolfgang Schulz on how platforms should be shaped by society.

From the HIIG BLOG

Social Media Councils can help to force digital platforms into responsibilty

Social Media Councils: An effective means of holding digital platforms accountable?

Social Media Councils may align public values with platform governance if platform economic incentives are taken into account.

One Council to Rule Them All: Can Social Media Become More Democratic?

Parliaments set the rules for democracies. Platforms rule their private online spaces. But as online spaces become ever more important for democratic discourse, we ask ourselves: Can we make platforms…

Trump’s social media ban: Reviewing the constitutionality of permanent digital punishment

Trump’s ban from social media, while gaining significant media attention, does not represent an isolated case. Preventing individuals from accessing social media platforms or parts of them is a common...

Trump’s very own platform? Two scenarios and their legal implications

Should it be up to private actors to decide whether or not to ban the US President from the digital public sphere? Most probably have a clear opinion on these...

When scholars sprint, bad algorithms are on the run

The first research sprint of the Ethics of Digitalisation project reached the finishing line. Thirteen international fellows tackled pressing issues concerning the use of AI in content moderation. Looking back...

More important than ever! Social Platform Governance during and after the 2020 US Presidential Election

The 2020 US Presidential Election has shown that practices of social platform governance and content moderation decisions are more crucial than ever. While the transparency of these algorithmic systems remains...