1st Berlin Colloquium – Workshop “Transformation of the Public Sphere”

31 October 2012

On October 25 /26 the Alexander von Humboldt Institute organized the 1st Berlin Colloquium on Internet und Society. All of its topics were aligned to our new research agenda and its main research areas Internet and Media RegulationInternet Policy and GovernanceInternet-enabled Innovation and Global Constitutionalism and the Internet. This series of posts introduces all presented research projects of the colloquium and is authored by the doctoral candidates of the Institute.

by Julian Staben

The workshop „Transformation of the Public Sphere”, moderated by Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz, was concerned with changes of the public sphere under the influence of modern internet communication. The three presenters approached their common topic of the interrelation of social networks and the public sphere mostly in due consideration of country-specific differences.

Jan-Felix Schrape – by videobuero.de

Jan-Felix Schrape raised the issue of the interrelation between social media and mass media. With regard to Luhmann’s theory of mass media he deduced that mass media’s traditional function of social guidance has not been replaced but rather complemented by social media with regards to underrepresented perspectives and issues.

Jingwei Wu introduced her research project concerned with an intercultural comparison between Germany and China, which focuses on the boundary between public and private. The influence of group types, culture and the media system on self-disclosure and expression of opinion will be examined using the example of social networking sites.

Evgeniya Boklage – by videbuero.de

Taking the example of the blogging community AntiDogma Evgeniya Boklage explores the structure of the Russian LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) blogosphere in comparison with the rest of the Russian blogosphere. As one of the first interim results for the LGBT blogosphere she noticed the solution of local problems with international help.

All three presenters conveyed the impression that the adaption of scientific methods to the internet, as for example the method of link analysis, is of high importance and reinforced how positions on boundaries between private and public vary considerably depending on the context of different topics.

Dieser Beitrag spiegelt die Meinung des Autors und weder notwendigerweise noch ausschließlich die Meinung des Institutes wider. Für mehr Informationen zu den Inhalten dieser Beiträge und den assoziierten Forschungsprojekten kontaktieren Sie bitte info@hiig.de

Weitere Artikel

ryoji-iwata-625080-unsplash

Status work in the data society: übercapital and hyper-individualisation

Whether it is childcare, credit or consumer goods: ratings, scores and the digital footprint produce new social classifications. This increasing quantification of the social is the reason for new forms...
kaltheuner_twitter.com-kalogatias

“It’s about human dignity and autonomy”

Privacy and data protection are currently being debated more intensively than ever before. In this interview, Frederike Kaltheuner from the civil rights organisation Privacy International explains why those terms have...
coworking

Employee empowerment or workers’ control? The use case of enterprise social networks

In the context of the digitization of the workplace, numerous companies are introducing digital platforms that are intended to strengthen employee participation. The implications of social media for the meaning...

Leave a Comment