Skip to content
31 October 2012

1st Berlin Colloquium – Workshop “Open Software & Open Design”

by Kaja Scheliga

This workshop was marked by an interdisciplinary approach: A lawyer examined software interoperability, a sociologist explored developments in the field of open design and a computer scientist moderated the discussion.

In the first part of the workshop Begoña González Otero (Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Munich) presented the findings of her PhD: Compelling to Disclose Software Interoperable Information: Risk for Innovation or Balanced Solution? She noted that software standards are in “a bit of a mess”. Software interoperability is needed so that programs can interact with each other and products can function together. However, in practice we often find compatibility instead of interoperability. The Digital Agenda for Europe 2010-2020 is working on improving and promoting the enhancement of interoperability. One highlighted recommendation is the revision of the Software Directive and its exceptions so as to enable interoperability without infringing the balance between copyright and competition law.

Begoña González Otero – by videobuero.de

In the second part of the workshop Christoph Schneider (Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis, Karlsruhe) introduced his PhD project: Concrete utopias of an open technology: The practices and futures of open design. He observes a shift from open source initiatives in the digital world to the tangible world. Fablabs, Hackerspaces or the MakerBot Industries are just a few examples. This shift opens up new paradigms for innovation. In his PhD project Christoph Schneider explores the interrelationship of visions and objects. How do visions of futures and technologies translate into open design practices? In this context objects are perceived as being in a fluid state and have a social life attributed to them. What happens to objects as they move from one stage to another? Moreover, objects have the potential to synchronise people when acquiring skills, sharing knowledge and solving problems. How is knowledge circulated in open design structures?

Christoph Schneider – by videobuero.de

To put this approach in a nutshell: “The future is open source everything” (Linus Torvalds).

This post represents the view of the author and does not necessarily represent the view of the institute itself. For more information about the topics of these articles and associated research projects, please contact info@hiig.de.

Martin Pleiss

Sign up for HIIG's Monthly Digest

HIIG-Newsletter-Header

You will receive our latest blog articles once a month in a newsletter.

Explore current HIIG Activities

Research issues in focus

HIIG is currently working on exciting topics. Learn more about our interdisciplinary pioneering work in public discourse.

Further articles

The picture shows a man wiping a large glass window. This is used as a metaphor for questioning assumptions about disinformation and seeking clearer understanding.

Debunking assumptions about disinformation: Rethinking what we think we know

Exploring definitions, algorithmic amplification, and detection, this article challenges assumptions about disinformation and calls for stronger research evidence.

A close-up of a red pedestrian “stop” signal, symbolising public resistance and protest. The image evokes the growing global pushback against artificial intelligence systems and the demand to pause, question, and regulate their unchecked development.

AI resistance: Who says no to AI and why?

This article shows how resisting AI systems means more than protest. It's a way to challenge power structures and call for more democratic governance.

The photo shows a close-up of a spiral seashell. This symbolises complexity and hidden layers, representing AI’s environmental impact across its full life cycle.

Blind spot sustainability: Making AI’s environmental impact measurable

AI's environmental impact spans its entire life cycle, but remains a blind spot due to missing data and limited transparency. What must change?